Wednesday, May 11, 2011

Minus First Draft on Markets and Development: Comments invited


10        KEY ECONOMIC SECTORS AND SERVICES

Minus first draft by Richard Tol

10.9.                                Impacts on markets and development (1328 out of 1900 words)
Above, we discuss the direct impacts of climate change on the economy sector by sector. There are, however, also indirect impacts. We first discuss the effects that impacts in one sector may have on the rest of the economy. We then turn to the impacts on economic growth and development.

10.9.1.                          General equilibrium effects (492 out of 950 words)
General equilibrium analysis considers the effect that climate change impacts in one sector may have on the rest of the economy. There are three channels through which this would occur. First, the output of one sector is used as an input to other sectors. For example, agricultural products are used in the food-processing industry. Second, products compete for the consumers’ expenditure. If, for example, food becomes more expensive, less money would be spent on other goods and services. Third, sectors compete for labor and capital. If more labor is needed in agriculture to offset a drop in crop yields, less labor is available to produce other goods and services.

Computable general equilibrium models have long been used to study the wider economic implications of changes in crop yields (Kane et al., 1992). Markets matter in agriculture. (Yates and Strzepek, 1998) show for instance that the impact of a reduced flow of the Nile on the economy of Egypt is much more severe without international trade than with, because trade would allow Egypt to focus on water-extensive production for export and import its food.

Older studies focused on the impact of climate change on patterns of specialization and trade, food prices, food security and welfare. This has been extended to land use (Lee, 2009; Ronneberger et al., 2009), water use (Calzadilla et al., 2011), and multiple stresses (Reilly et al., 2007). General equilibrium models have also been used to estimate the value of improved weather forecasts (Arndt and Bacou, 2000), a form of adaptation to climate change.

Computable general equilibrium analysis has also been used to study impacts other than agriculture, notably sea level rise (Bosello et al., 2007; Darwin and Tol, 2001), tourism (Berrittella et al., 2006; Bigano et al., 2008), and human health (Bosello et al., 2006). (Ciscar et al., 2011) study the combined effect of agriculture, sea level rise, river floods and tourism on the European economy. They find a welfare loss of 0.2-1.0% of income by the end of the century for the European Union. There are large regional differences with losses in Southern Europe and gains in Northern Europe.

The following conclusions emerge. First, markets matter. Impacts are transmitted from one place and sector to the rest of the world. Landlocked countries are affected by sea level rise because their agricultural land increases in value as other countries face erosion and floods. Second, consumers and producers are often affected differently. The price increase induced by a reduction in production may leave producers better off while hurting consumers. Third, relatives are more important than absolutes. A loss of production may be advantageous if the competition loses more. Fourth, the distribution of the direct impacts can be very different than the distribution of the indirect effects. Fifth, a loss of productivity or productive assets in one sector leads to further losses in the rest of the economy. Direct impacts are therefore a lower bound estimate of the true economic impacts.


10.9.2.                          Growth effects  (769 out of 950 words)
Climate change would also affect economic growth and development, but our understanding is limited.  (Fankhauser and Tol, 2005) investigate four standard models of economic growth, including the impact of climate change on economic production, capital depreciation, and the labor force. They find that, in three models, the fall in economic output is slightly larger than the direct impact on markets – that is, the total impact is more than twice as large as the direct impact – while the 4th model (which emphasizes human capital accumulation) points to indirect impacts that are 1.5 times as large as the direct impacts. (Hallegatte, 2005) reaches a similar conclusion. (Hallegatte and Thery, 2007; Hallegatte and Ghil, 2008; Hallegatte and Dumas, 2009) highlight that the impact of climate change on economic growth can be amplified by market imperfections and the business cycle. (Eboli et al., 2010) use a multi-sector, multi-region growth model. The impact of climate change would lead to a 0.3% reduction of GDP in 2050. Regional impacts are more pronounced, ranging from -1.0% in developing countries to +0.4% in Australia and Canada. Sectoral results are varied too, with output changes ranging from output of +0.5% for power generation (to meet increased demand to air conditioning) to -0.7% for natural gas (as demand for space heating falls) and rice.

Using a biophysical model of the human body’s ability to do work, (Kjellstrom et al., 2009) find that by the end of the century climate change may reduce labor productivity by 11-27% in the humid (sub)tropics. Assuming a output elasticity of labor of 0.8, this would reduce economic output in the affected sectors (involving heavy manual labor without air conditioning) by 8-22%. Although structural change in the economy may well reduce the dependence on manual labor and air conditioning would be an effective adaptation, even the ameliorated impact would have a substantial, but as yet unquantified, impact on economic growth.

(Tang et al., 2009) find empirical evidence for a climate-health-poverty trap. This is supported by yet-to-be-published model analyses (Bretscher and Valente, 2010; Gollin and Zimmermann, 2008; Gollin and Zimmermann, 2010; Ikefuji et al., 2010). Climate-related diseases such as malaria and diarrhea impair children’s cognitive and physical development. This leads to poverty in their later life so that there are limited means to protect their own children against these diseases. Furthermore, high infant mortality may induce parents to have many children so that their investment in education is spread thin. An increase in infant and child mortality and morbidity due to climate change would thus trap more people in poverty.

Poverty is concentrated in the tropics and subtropics. This has led some analysts to the conclusion that a tropical climate is one of the causes of poverty. (Gallup et al., 1999) emphasize the link between climate, disease, and poverty while (Masters and McMillan, 2001) focus on climate, agricultural pests, and poverty. Other studies (Acemoglu et al., 2001; Acemoglu et al., 2002; Easterly and Levine, 2003) argue that climatic influence on development disappears if differences in human institutions (the rule of law, education, etc) are accounted for. However, (Van der Vliert, 2008) demonstrates that climate affects human culture and thus institutions, but this venue has yet to be explored in the economic growth literature.

In a statistical analysis, (Dell et al., 2009) find that one degree of warming would reduce income by 1.2% in the short run, and by 0.5% in the long run. The difference is due to adaptation. (Horowitz, 2009) finds a much larger effect: a 3.8% drop in income in the long run for one degree of warming. In a yet-unpublished study, (Dell et al., 2008) find that climate (change) has no effect on economic growth in countries with an income above the global median ($PPP,20003170) but a large impact on countries below the median. If adaptation can be completed within 10 years, economic growth in the 21st century would be 0.6% slower if climate changes according to the A2 scenario than in the case without climate change. If economic growth is 2.6% per year without climate change, and 2.0% with, then a century of climate change would reduce income by 44%.

In sum, the literature on the impact of climate and climate change on economic growth and development has yet to reach firm conclusions. There is agreement that climate change would moderate the rate of economic growth, by a little according to some studies and by a lot according to other studies. There is disagreement whether climate change would affect the process of climate change, with some studies suggesting that more people may be trapped in poverty and fewer people enjoying exponential growth.

References
Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J.A. Robinson, 2001: The colonial origins of comparative development: An empirical investigation. American Economic Review, 4(91), 1369-1401.
Acemoglu, D., S. Johnson, and J.A. Robinson, 2002: Reversal of fortune: Geography and institutions in the making of the modern world income distribution. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 4(117), 1231-1294.
Arndt, C. and M. Bacou, 2000: Economy-wide effects of climate variability and climate prediction in mozambique. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 3(82), 750-754.
Berrittella, M., A. Bigano, R. Roson, and R.S.J. Tol, 2006: A general equilibrium analysis of climate change impacts on tourism. Tourism Management, 5(27), 913-924.
Bigano, A., F. Bosello, R. Roson, and R.S.J. Tol, 2008: Economy-wide impacts of climate change: A joint analysis for sea level rise and tourism. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 8(13), 765-791.
Bosello, F., R. Roson, and R.S.J. Tol, 2006: Economy-wide estimates of the implications of climate change: Human health. Ecological Economics, 3(58), 579-591.
Bosello, F., R. Roson, and R.S.J. Tol, 2007: Economy-wide estimates of the implications of climate change: Sea level rise. Environmental and Resource Economics, 3(37), 549-571.
Bretscher, L. and S. Valente, 2010: Uneven Development due to Climate Change -- Growth Effects of Climate Change Exposure and Adaptation, Centre of Economic Research, ETH, Zurich, .
Calzadilla, A., K. Rehdanz, and R.S.J. Tol, 2011: Trade liberalization and climate change: A CGE analysis of the impacts on global agriculture. Water, 2(3), 526-550.
Ciscar, J.-., A. Iglesias, L. Feyen, L. Szabó, D. Van Regemorter, B. Amelung, R. Nicholls, P. Watkiss, O.B. Christensen, R. Dankers, L. Garrote, C.M. Goodess, A. Hunt, A. Moreno, J. Richards, and A. Soria, 2011: Physical and economic consequences of climate change in europe. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 7(108), 2678-2683.
Darwin, R.F. and R.S.J. Tol, 2001: Estimates of the economic effects of sea level rise. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2(19), 113-129.
Dell, M., B.F. Jones, and B.A. Olken, 2009: Temperature and income: Reconciling new cross-sectional and panel estimates. American Economic Review, 2(99), 198-204.
Dell, M., B.F. Jones, and B.A. Olken, 2008: Climate Change and Economic Growth: Evidence from the Last Half Century, National Bureau of Economic Research, Washington,DC, 1-48 pp.
Easterly, W. and R. Levine, 2003: Tropics, germs, and crops: How endowments influence economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 1(50), 3-39.
Eboli, F., R. Parrado, and R. Roson, 2010: Climate-change feedback on economic growth: Explorations with a dynamic general equilibrium model. Environment and Development Economics, 5(15), 515-533.
Fankhauser, S. and R.S.J. Tol, 2005: On climate change and economic growth. Resource and Energy Economics, 1(27), 1-17.
Gallup, J.L., J.D. Sachs, and A.D. Mellinger, 1999: Geography and economic development. International Regional Science Review, 2(22), 179-232.
Gollin, D. and C. Zimmermann, 2008: Malaria: Disease Impacts and Long-Run Income Differences, Economics Department, Williams College, Williamstown, .
Gollin, D. and C. Zimmermann, 2010: Global Climate Change and the Resurgence of Tropical Disease: An Economic Approach, Economics Department, Williams College, Williamstown, .
Hallegatte, S., 2005: The long time scales of the climate-economy feedback and the climatic cost of growth. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 4(10), 277-289.
Hallegatte, S. and P. Dumas, 2009: Can natural disasters have positive consequences? investigating the role of embodied technical change. Ecological Economics, 3(68), 777-786.
Hallegatte, S. and M. Ghil, 2008: Natural disasters impacting a macroeconomic model with endogenous dynamics. Ecological Economics, 1-2(68), 582-592.
Hallegatte, S. and D. Thery, 2007: Are the economic impacts of climate change underestimated? Revue d'Economie Politique, 4(117), 507-522.
Horowitz, J.K., 2009: The income-temperature relationship in a cross-section of countries and its implications for predicting the effects of global warming. Environmental and Resource Economics, 4(44), 475-493.
Ikefuji, M., J. Magnus, and H. Sakamoto, 2010: Climate Change, Economic Growth, and Health, Osaka, Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University, .
Kane, S., J.M. Reilly, and J. Tobey, 1992: An empirical study of the economic effects of climate change on world agriculture. Climatic Change, 1(21), 17-35.
Kjellstrom, T., R.S. Kovats, S.J. Lloyd, T. Holt, and R.S.J. Tol, 2009: The direct impact of climate change on regional labor productivity. Archives of Environmental and Occupational Health, 4(64), 217-227.
Lee, H.-., 2009: The impact of climate change on global food supply and demand, food prices, and land use. Paddy and Water Environment, 4(7), 321-331.
Masters, W.A. and M.S. McMillan, 2001: Climate and scale in economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 3(6), 167-186.
Reilly, J.M., S. Paltsev, B. Felzer, X. Wang, D.W. Kicklighter, J.M. Melillo, R.G. Prinn, M. Sarofim, A.P. Sokolov, and C. Wang, 2007: Global economic effects of changes in crops, pasture, and forests due to changing climate, carbon dioxide, and ozone. Energy Policy, (35), 5370-5383.
Ronneberger, K., M. Berrittella, F. Bosello, and R.S.J. Tol, 2009: KLUM@GTAP: Introducing biophysical aspects of land-use decisions into a computable general equilibrium model a coupling experiment. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 2(14), 149-168.
Tang, K.K., D. Petrie, and D.S.P. Rao, 2009: The income-climate trap of health development: A comparative analysis of african and non-african countries. Social Science and Medicine, 7(69), 1099-1106.
Van der Vliert, E., 2008: Climate, affluence, and culture Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 264.
Yates, D.N. and K.M. Strzepek, 1998: An assessment of integrated climate change impacts on the agricultural economy of egypt. Climatic Change, 3(38), 261-287.

Tuesday, May 10, 2011

drafting at last

People regularly complain that I write tersely.

The literature on climate change is growing rapidly. The size of the IPCC reports grows slowly.

The page limits in Ch10 are such that I have trouble fitting all relative material in, and still be comprehensible.

Friday, January 14, 2011

Government review

I was invited to act as an expert reviewer of the IPCC Special Report on Extreme Events on behalf of the Netherlands government. In the letter of invitation, the Government reserved the right to censor my comments, in case my comments would disagree with another referee's comments or in case my comments would meet resistance from unidentified people.

I declined the invitation.

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

First lead authors meeting, Tsukuba, January 2011

The first lead authors meeting is this week in Tsukuba (near Tokyo). The aim is to agree on an outline and allocate tasks.

The starting point is an outline that was written by a jet-lagged, non-expert committee. It is full of holes and overlaps. It is hard to set this straight, as most everyone here is jetlagged too -- and there are 30 chapters and therefore 60+ CLAs. Chapter 10 needs to be coordinated with no less than 11 other chapters.

Two things were discussed that will come to haunt us.

First, everything we write in an IPCC context is potentially subject to a Freedom of Information request -- either under national or EU law. A substantial share of authors is not used to working under those circumstances.

Second, a decision was made to disclose potential conflicts of interest -- but details are given verbally, no preparation time was given, and statements are not checked. Only a summary will be committed to paper.

Thursday, December 9, 2010

New assessment of the IPCC

Access IPCC is using fancy tools to assess the Fourth Assessment Report. You can quibble with their criteria, but the idea is sound and the implementation impressive.

Wednesday, October 20, 2010

IPCC authors

Donna is having a go at the so-called "top scientists" who write the IPCC report. She found 1, 2, 3, 4 authors who where fresh out of grad school (if that) when elevated to the IPCC. There are more examples, of course: Sam Fankhauser, Richard Klein and myself.
I think it is good for an author team to have a mix of talent and experience. I think the fault lies with the leadership, who claim -- incorrectly as they well know -- that only top people write for the IPCC.
The infamous social cost chapter of AR2 had seven authors: one senior academic who guided the chapter, one senior consultant, two figureheads, and three juniors who did most of the work. It worked well. The team was fine, the chapter good. But of the seven, only David Pearce could be called top.
Thanks to Donna for exposing yet more lies. May the IPCC leaders start telling the truth.
UPDATE: #5 was added. Donna highlights another lie. Here's the truth: I'm younger than Richard Klein, and I was a CLA before him. See Donna #6.

Friday, October 15, 2010

IPCC reform (okay, a little bit)

More details have emerged on the "reform" of the IPCC.
1. The guidelines for non-peer-reviewed material have been updated. The old guidelines were fine. They were just not implemented.
2. Review editors will be reminded of their role (sic).
3. The guidelines for uncertainty will be updated. I found this a minor irritant in the past -- replacing judgement with ill-defined rules -- and I expect that the new guidelines will not improve things. No shortcut can do justice to the complexities of conveying degrees of confidence.
4. There will be a policy on conflicts of interest.

Point 4 is the only real progress, and it only matters if it is implemented -- unlike previous IPCC policies on basically everything.

The Plenary deferred all other reforms to a committee.

Pachauri still chairs the IPCC. He is incompetent, but that used to be irrelevant as the IPCC chair is a figurehead anyway. However, he has clearly and repeatedly demonstrated his incompetence to the world. Pachauri is a liability to the IPCC, and he should go.

The new conflict of interests policy will be tested immediately. Either the policy is not serious, or the IPCC chair will violate the policy.